Regarding The controversies surrounding our american pledge of allegiance.
All the matters aside as to where it may came from or the allocations as to it's racial status I think that a major factor missing in the controversies that I have so far seen is what does it mean. What is the meaning the theme the purpose or objective if you will of our pledge of allegiance. Why have we for the many years that we have stood before our american flag and recited the words relative to such. In the meaning of such words defined; for the words of which a defintion of meaning may be neccessary; mainly the statement "and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. As follows are my interpretations of such:
"And to the republic for which it stands" more than likely construing an allegiance to other countries/governments that stand to the purpose and objective of one nation under God indivisible etc.
I guess the main question would be what could it mean one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
Considering all the theological reasoning regarding God for now let us set God aside as another subject fore the reasoning surrounding who or what may God be is a whole subject in self so for now what could it mean " one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all" but having a nation that is not divided in it's construction that would hinder the breadth of the whole to pursue there endeavors, rights or desires if you will within the apptitudes of that construction; and as per the rights of that objective and purpose and the constitution derived from such those folks trying to abolish our pledge of allegiance have a right to do so; that is try.
I can only at this point imagine what it would be like to be nationed by a different purpose and objective where unity is not the goal and oppression has taken over; wherein the brethren of the different makes and accords find unreason just because the other is of a different accord and for no reason of justice or equality; and the nation isn't governed by some basis of reason that considers the rights of all peoples involved; but just favored groups.
Sometimes I wonder what motivates these people to initiate these landmarks that they do. Where are these seeds coming from. Sometimes I wonder is there some type of silent invasion talking place attempting to use covert methods to destroy our objective as Americans and the republics that stand as such so that we inconspicuously lose a war without ever fighting by silently replacing our objective and constitution with that of another that would be biased in it's relation to liberty and unity; if you considered what would desire otherwise other than unity and a liberty for all.
Explained in a previous blog are my views on a "liberty for all". See the blog article the ban of menthol cigarettes.
Where is our country and the republics that stand to that cause of unity heading to with the anilliation of said objective of unity but to oppression and to a standstill of our forward growth as the possibilities of liberty are also dissolved; if not to a destruction as the forces that oppose liberty and unity begin to reign as ruler and proceed to divide men unto their objective of a separated fold and a self refurbishment.
Are their covert methods in play trying to lead us to that end of our republic that stands for unity as per what might be considered to be unity amongst a vast diversified population of people.
"And God in the sorrow of his loneliness begauht of companionship". Are we not all under God destined to his rule as per his master plan to govern the efforts of life; if correct in theory that the purpose of all life is to be companions for the almighty God who as per a biblical scripture " in the sorrow of said loneliness begauht of companionship"; the only support available to reinforce said scripture being the considerations applied to such such as the basis of life being a force of motion and the physics of motion which require an intertia a push to get started and what seems to be standards in life which seems to apply to most matter even inanimate matter where everything seems to start young and get older and seems to start small and get larger.
Examples of inertia the initial push needed to start the motions of life:
The wind carrying pollen to some type of plant life.
Animals or people having sex.
An inspiration or idea that may lead to a growth.
And more than likely countless more "pushes/inertias" needed to spontane into life that are not listed here if one were to consider what the vastness of the universe may entail.
So if indeed all life started from that young small matter what was the push involved to initialize such motion if indeed correct in theory that that sequence of growth applies to the development of the whole universe.
What force brewed the first seed that started the development of the universe to perhaps include the development of time itself ?
Are we all not under God thereby ? That is of course if correct in theory as to who or what God may be the creator of all life to include what is usually perceived as being a hinderence to life the devil and Satan and the emotions correspondent with such; to consider the rights of his whole fold with the manifestation of his master plan; to allow the manifestation of the emotions mentioned when appropriate and to spawn accordingly; as according to a biblical scripture that describe the devil and Satan what ever the true appropriation of a title may be; as being emotions of hate, contention, scorn etc. of which would probably desire otherwise other than unity.
The saint's in scripture advise to " refrain from adopting the precepts of Satan". If correct in theory the saint's advise such to save a person from the devil and the emotions relative to such if correct in theory who's job it is to divide men and try to try to make them destroy each other and if also correct in theory even try to destroy the person adopting such precepts as per how the theorized nature and spawn of said emotion is when used; how ever an emotion of what might be considered to be of destruction would try to destroy a person.
And the lord said "Vengeance will be mine".
Could that be par with the lords vengeance to give a person unto the devil when the advise of the saints is not followed and then to have the emotion or emotions relative to the devil and satan respond accordingly; as per theory instituting an attack directly upon the physci of the person unto it's manifestation of purpose.
If correct in theory the lord impales his vengeance upon a person to punish a person not to help them therefore what could the devil and Satan be when installed for failure to follow the advise of the saint's but a punishment from God.
Why would God design such aspects into his master plan but to perhaps emphasize upon the preferred course that mankind/human kind follow; to gain the ordinance over what might be considered as being the forces of nature that would turn us as mankind to destroy each other so that we could live side by side without the ever presence of destruction.
Could the correlatives of our pledge of allegiance and our reasons for reciting the words mentioned when exercised be an objective seed to institute an objective of unity, a higher goal developed within the minds of the youth in an attempt to bring peace to mankind by the practise thereof and in turn stay the emotions of the devil and Satan from reigning as ruler so that the objective of peace and unity amongst mankind can remain in light; if indeed you consider the nature of what the devil's emotions may entail when reigning as ruler of a country or of the earth.
The fate of our country and our sovereign republic lies in our hands as per how we realize matters and proceed.
"Let us not forget history and the power that the the devil has when he rises to power to divide men and let us not forget the destructions of that division fore when the devil and Satan rises to power God does that to destroy humankind".